• Deutsch
Login

OPUS

  • Home
  • Search
  • Browse
  • Publish
  • FAQ

Refine

Author

  • Grimm, Rüdiger (3)
  • Staab, Steffen (3)
  • Ebert, Jürgen (2)
  • Frick, Norbert (2)
  • Maron, Markus (2)
  • Schulze, Michael (2)
  • Wirth, Stephan (2)
  • Abert, Oliver (1)
  • Achilles, Sabine (1)
  • Ameling, Stefan (1)
+ more

Year of publication

  • 2008 (88) (remove)

Document Type

  • Study Thesis (26)
  • Diploma Thesis (23)
  • Doctoral Thesis (15)
  • Part of Periodical (14)
  • Bachelor Thesis (5)
  • Master's Thesis (5)

Language

  • German (70)
  • English (18)

Has Fulltext

  • yes (85)
  • no (3)

Keywords

  • Bildverarbeitung (3)
  • Computerspiel (3)
  • Analyse durch Synthese (2)
  • Business Intelligence (2)
  • Computergrafik (2)
  • E-IMS (2)
  • E-Partizipation (2)
  • Electronic Government (2)
  • Evaluation (2)
  • Informatik (2)
+ more

Institute

  • Institut für Computervisualistik (23)
  • Fachbereich 4 (22)
  • Institut für Wirtschafts- und Verwaltungsinformatik (21)
  • Institut für Informatik (14)
  • Institut für Softwaretechnik (6)
  • Fachbereich 8 (3)
  • Institut für Management (3)
  • Fachbereich 6 (2)
  • Institut für naturwissenschaftliche Bildung (2)
  • Arbeitsbereich Biopsychologie, Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie (1)
+ more

88 search hits

  • 2 to 2
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
Methods for polyp detection in colonoscopy videos: a review (2008)
Ameling, Stefan ; Wirth, Stephan ; Paulus, Dietrich
Colonoscopy is one of the best methods for screening colon cancer. As the automatic detection of polyps in endoscopic images is a challenging task for image processing, a variety of research groups have proposed methods that try to fulfill this task to develop a system which supports the doctors during examination. However, the problem is still "at least partially" not solved. This paper gives a summary of 16 different polyp detection methods published in the last ten years. We found out that the major draw-back of many approaches is the lack of representative video data, which hinders comparison and evaluation of the published methods.
  • 2 to 2

OPUS4 Logo

  • Contact
  • Imprint
  • Sitelinks