Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Ausgabe (Heft) zu einer Zeitschrift (352) (entfernen)
Sprache
- Deutsch (267)
- Englisch (84)
- Mehrsprachig (1)
Schlagworte
- Vorlesungsverzeichnis (55)
- Forschen in Koblenz (6)
- Junges Forschen (6)
- Wissenschaft Koblenz (6)
- Bluetooth (4)
- computer clusters (4)
- ontology (4)
- Knowledge Compilation (3)
- Petri-Netze (3)
- parallel algorithms (3)
Institut
- Zentrale Einrichtungen (169)
- Fachbereich 4 (132)
- Institut für Informatik (38)
- Institut für Wirtschafts- und Verwaltungsinformatik (35)
- Institut für Management (31)
- Institute for Web Science and Technologies (15)
- Institut für Computervisualistik (12)
- Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik (7)
- Institut für Evangelische Theologie (7)
- Institut für Kulturwissenschaft (7)
Conventional security infrastructures in the Internet cannot be directly adopted to ambient systems, especially if based on short-range communication channels: Personal, mobile devices are used and the participants are present during communication, so privacy protection is a crucial issue. As ambient systems cannot rely on an uninterrupted connection to a Trust Center, certiffed data has to be veriffed locally. Security techniques have to be adjusted to the special environment. This paper introduces a public key infrastructure (PKI) to provide secure communication channels with respect to privacy, confidentiality, data integrity, non-repudiability, and user or device authentication. It supports three certiffcate levels with a different balance between authenticity and anonymity. This PKI is currently under implementation as part of the iCity project.
The processing of data is often restricted by contractual and legal requirements for protecting privacy and IPRs. Policies provide means to control how and by whom data is processed. Conditions of policies may depend on the previous processing of the data. However, existing policy languages do not provide means to express such conditions. In this work we present a formal model and language allowing for specifying conditions based on the history of data processing. We base the model and language on XACML.
Informatik hautnah erleben
(2010)
In vielen Köpfen - sowohl bei Erwachsenen wie auch bei Schülern - geistert der Glaube, dass Informatik die Wissenschaft der "Computerlehre" ist. Schon der berühmte Satz "In der Informatik geht es genauso wenig um Computer wie in der Astronomie um Teleskope", der dem Informatiker Edsger W. Dijkstra (1930 - 2002) zugeschrieben wird, drückt historisch schon früh den Gedanken aus, dass die Informatik den Computer nur als ein Hilfsmittel und Medium nutzt, genauso wie die Mathematik den Taschenrechner. Die Fehlvorstellung, die leider auch häufig in den Schulen vermittelt wird, zeigt, dass hier Aufklärung nötig ist.
Hybrid automata are used as standard means for the specification and analysis of dynamical systems. Several researches have approached them to formally specify reactive Multi-agent systems situated in a physical environment, where the agents react continuously to their environment. The specified systems, in turn, are formally checked with the help of existing hybrid automata verification tools. However, when dealing with multi-agent systems, two problems may be raised. The first problem is a state space problem raised due to the composition process, where the agents have to be parallel composed into an agent capturing all possible behaviors of the multi-agent system prior to the verification phase. The second problem concerns the expressiveness of verification tools when modeling and verifying certain behaviors. Therefore, this paper tackles these problems by showing how multi-agent systems, specified as hybrid automata, can be modeled and verified using constraint logic programming(CLP). In particular, a CLP framework is presented to show how the composition of multi-agent behaviors can be captured dynamically during the verification phase. This can relieve the state space complexity that may occur as a result of the composition process. Additionally, the expressiveness of the CLP model flexibly allows not only to model multi-agent systems, but also to check various properties by means of the reachability analysis. Experiments are promising to show the feasibility of our approach.
Geschäftsordnung des Interdisziplinären Promotionszentrums der Universität Koblenz-Landau
Ordnung für die Prüfung im Bachelorstudiengang und im Masterstudiengang BioGeoWissenschaften der Universität Koblenz-Landau
Ordnung zur Aufhebung der Ordnung für die Prüfung im Bachelorstudiengang Ecological Impact Assessment und der Ordnung für die Prüfung im Masterstudiengang Ecological Impact Assessment in Freshwater Ecosystems an der Universität Koblenz-Landau
Gemeinsame Prüfungsordnung für den Bachelorstudiengang und den Masterstudiengang "Psychologie" des Fachbereichs Psychologie der Universität Koblenz-Landau, Campus Landau
Ordnung zur Aufhebung der Diplomprüfungsordnung für Studierende der Psychologie an der Universität Koblenz-Landau, Abteilung Landau
Ordnung zur Änderung der Prüfungsordnung für den Bachelorstudiengang "Sozialwissenschaften" und den Masterstudiengang "Moderne Gesellschaften im Wandel" des Fachbereichs 6: Kultur- und Sozialwissenschaften an der Universität Koblenz-Landau
Existing tools for generating application programming interfaces (APIs) for ontologies lack sophisticated support for mapping the logics-based concepts of the ontology to an appropriate object-oriented implementation of the API. Such a mapping has to overcome the fundamental differences between the semantics described in the ontology and the pragmatics, i.e., structure, functionalities, and behavior implemented in the API. Typically, concepts from the ontology are mapped one-to-one to classes in the targeted programming language. Such a mapping only produces concept representations but not an API at the desired level of granularity expected by an application developer. We present a Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) process to generate customized APIs for ontologies. This API generation is based on the semantics defined in the ontology but also leverages additional information the ontology provides. This can be the inheritance structure of the ontology concepts, the scope of relevance of an ontology concept, or design patterns defined in the ontology.