Genetically modified plants have been grown commercially for about 25 years. Bt plants, which contain genes from the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) and produce Cry proteins, are used particularly frequently. Risk assessment has long focused on the terrestrial environment. Only since the publication of Rosi-Marshall et al. in 2007 potential effects on the aquatic environment came into focus. The first part of this dissertation analyse the existing literature on lower-tier effect studies and fate studies examining the effects of GM plants on the aquatic environment. Potential effects on aquatic organisms are apparent. Some studies also demonstrate the entry of GM plant material into the aquatic environment and the leaching of toxins into the water. The second part of the dissertation investigate the effects of Cry1Ab toxin on two species of caddisfly larvae (Chaetopterryx spec., Sericostoma spec.). Trichopterans are phylogenetically closely related to lepidopterans, which are often the target organisms of Cry toxins. In order to be able to create several concentrations, a new spiking method was used in which dissolved Cry1Ab toxin was applied on leaves of black alder (Alnus glutinosa). Effects were particularly evident at sublethal endpoints. The lipid content of Chaetopteryx spec. larvae was lower after twelve weeks with increasing Cry1Ab concentration. The reduction in lipid content may indicate an increase in energy requirements for repair mechanisms. Sericostoma spec. showed a slowdown in larval development at the highest Cry1Ab concentration after six weeks, which could lead to later emergence and thus effects on the food chain. In the third part of the dissertation, the assessment of impacts of GM crops on the aquatic environment was investigated using higher-tier studies. Since higher-tier studies are already common with pesticides, these were compared to the higher-tier studies already conducted with GM crops. It is found that there is no standardization of higher-tier studies with GM crops, which is necessary for quality assurance and comparability of studies. In addition, there are great difficulties in establishing different test concentrations, which is necessary for the investigation of a dose-response relationship. Overall, it is clear that there are still significant knowledge gaps of the effects of GM plants on the aquatic environment. Further studies are essential for a comprehensive and meaningful risk assessment.