Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
- 2008 (18) (entfernen)
Dokumenttyp
- Ausgabe (Heft) zu einer Zeitschrift (6)
- Dissertation (5)
- Masterarbeit (3)
- Diplomarbeit (2)
- Studienarbeit (2)
Sprache
- Englisch (18) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Abduktion <Logik> (1)
- Bayes-Netz (1)
- Bayesian Networks (1)
- Beruflicher Kontakt (1)
- Beschaffung (1)
- Bluetooth (1)
- Bürgerbeiteiligung (1)
- CodeBlue (1)
- Computer Security (1)
- Computersicherheit (1)
Institut
- Fachbereich 4 (8)
- Institut für Informatik (7)
- Institut für Wirtschafts- und Verwaltungsinformatik (3)
- Fachbereich 6 (1)
- Fachbereich 8 (1)
- Institut für Computervisualistik (1)
- Institut für Integrierte Naturwissenschaften, Abt. Biologie (1)
- Institut für Management (1)
- Institut für Softwaretechnik (1)
- Institut für fremdsprachliche Philologien (1)
This volume contains those research papers presented at the Second International Conference on Tests and Proofs (TAP 2008) that were not included in the main conference proceedings. TAP was the second conference devoted to the convergence of proofs and tests. It combines ideas from both areas for the advancement of software quality. To prove the correctness of a program is to demonstrate, through impeccable mathematical techniques, that it has no bugs; to test a program is to run it with the expectation of discovering bugs. On the surface, the two techniques seem contradictory: if you have proved your program, it is fruitless to comb it for bugs; and if you are testing it, that is surely a sign that you have given up on any hope of proving its correctness. Accordingly, proofs and tests have, since the onset of software engineering research, been pursued by distinct communities using rather different techniques and tools. And yet the development of both approaches leads to the discovery of common issues and to the realization that each may need the other. The emergence of model checking has been one of the first signs that contradiction may yield to complementarity, but in the past few years an increasing number of research efforts have encountered the need for combining proofs and tests, dropping earlier dogmatic views of their incompatibility and taking instead the best of what each of these software engineering domains has to offer. The first TAP conference (held at ETH Zurich in February 2007) was an attempt to provide a forum for the cross-fertilization of ideas and approaches from the testing and proving communities. For the 2008 edition we found the Monash University Prato Centre near Florence to be an ideal place providing a stimulating environment. We wish to sincerely thank all the authors who submitted their work for consideration. And we would like to thank the Program Committee members as well as additional referees for their great effort and professional work in the review and selection process. Their names are listed on the following pages. In addition to the contributed papers, the program included three excellent keynote talks. We are grateful to Michael Hennell (LDRA Ltd., Cheshire, UK), Orna Kupferman (Hebrew University, Israel), and Elaine Weyuker (AT&T Labs Inc., USA) for accepting the invitation to address the conference. Two very interesting tutorials were part of TAP 2008: "Parameterized Unit Testing with Pex" (J. de Halleux, N. Tillmann) and "Integrating Verification and Testing of Object-Oriented Software" (C. Engel, C. Gladisch, V. Klebanov, and P. Rümmer). We would like to express our thanks to the tutorial presenters for their contribution. It was a team effort that made the conference so successful. We are grateful to the Conference Chair and the Steering Committee members for their support. And we particularly thank Christoph Gladisch, Beate Körner, and Philipp Rümmer for their hard work and help in making the conference a success. In addition, we gratefully acknowledge the generous support of Microsoft Research Redmond, who financed an invited speaker.
The University of Koblenz-Landau would like to apply for participation in the RoboCup Mixed Reality League in Suzhou, China 2008. Our team is composed of ten team members and two supervisors. All members are graduate students of Computational Visualistics. Our supervisors are Ph.D. candidates currently researching in the working groups of artificial intelligence and computer graphics.
Social networking platforms as creativity fostering systems: research model and exploratory study
(2008)
Social networking platforms are enabling users to create their own content, share this content with anyone they invite and organize connections with existing or new online contacts. Within these electronic environments users voluntarily add comments on virtual boards, distribute their search results or add information about their expertise areas to their social networking profiles and thereby share it with acquaintances, friends and increasingly even with colleagues in the corporate world. As a result, it is most likely that the underlying knowledge sharing processes result in many new and creative ideas. The objective of our research therefore is to understand if and how social social networking platforms can enforce creativity. In addition, we look at how these processes could be embedded within the organizational structures that influence innovative knowledge sharing behavior. The basis for our research is a framework which focuses on the relations between intrinsic motivation, creativity and social networking platforms. First results of our empirical investigation of a social software platform called "StudiVZ.net" proved that our two propositions are valid.
Probability propagation nets
(2008)
In der vorliegenden Arbeit wird eine Petri-Netz-Repräsentation für die Propagation von Wahrscheinlichkeiten und Evidenzen (Likelihoods) vorgestellt und auf probabilistische Horn-Abduktion sowie Fehlerbäume und Bayes-Netze angewendet. Diese sogenannten Wahrscheinlichkeits-Propagations-Netze (probability propagation nets) machen Propagations-Prozesse transparent, indem sie strukturelle und dynamische Aspekte in einer homogenen Darstellung vereinen. Anhand populärer Beispiele wird verdeutlicht, dass Wahrscheinlichkeits-Propagations-Netze die Propagations-Prozesse - besonders im Hinblick auf die Bayes-Netz-Algorithmik - anschaulich darstellen und gut nachvollziehbar machen, so dass sie sich für die Analyse und Diagnose probabilistischer Modelle eignen. Durch die Repräsentation von Fehlerbäumen mit Wahrscheinlichkeits-Propagations-Netzen können diese Vorzüge auf die Modellierung technischer Systeme übertragen werden.
Querying for meta knowledge
(2008)
The Semantic Web is based on accessing and reusing RDF data from many different sources, which one may assign different levels of authority and credibility. Existing Semantic Web query languages, like SPARQL, have targeted the retrieval, combination and reuse of facts, but have so far ignored all aspects of meta knowledge, such as origins, authorship, recency or certainty of data, to name but a few. In this paper, we present an original, generic, formalized and implemented approach for managing many dimensions of meta knowledge, like source, authorship, certainty and others. The approach re-uses existing RDF modeling possibilities in order to represent meta knowledge. Then, it extends SPARQL query processing in such a way that given a SPARQL query for data, one may request meta knowledge without modifying the query proper. Thus, our approach achieves highly flexible and automatically coordinated querying for data and meta knowledge, while completely separating the two areas of concern.
This thesis is concerned with an issue of considerable importance to the development of revision skills: the role of teacher feedback. Prompted by the concern to develop a model of instruction which will help students write to the best of their capacities, the present study forms a proposal: an interactive model of revision. The study researches whether the kind of feedback proposed in this model is indeed a helpful tool for revision and whether the kind of negotiated revision that occurs is a vehicle for learning. The first section of the thesis reviews different areas of literature which are relevant to the study. More specifically, Chapter 2 presents the historical and theoretical foundations of different writing instructional practices and sheds light on issues concerning the use of the process approach. It also reviews research based on sociocognitive theoretical perspectives in an attempt to delineate the impact of interpersonal or social activity on individual performance and progress. Chapter 3 examines issues associated with the process approach in particular and illustrates how theory and method come together in a process writing classroom. Chapter 4 presents the differences in revising behaviours between experienced and inexperienced writers in both L1 and L2 contexts and the various ways these differences have been justified. It also highlights a number of issues which have been identified as contributing to effective revision. Particular attention is paid to the role that teacher feedback has to play as a means of promoting substantive student revision with an instructional emphasis on fluency, organisation and language. Chapter 5 presents an interactive model of revision, which envisions a communicative exchange between two partners, the student-writer and the teacher-reader, collaborating in order to develop awareness of revision strategies and establish criteria for effective writing. Chapter 6 investigates the epistemological basis of the research and presents a set of research questions and hypotheses, which guided the investigation. Chapter 7 frames the context of the research and details the methods used to collect the data from the study. The study involved 100 Year 7 students in two gymnasia in Koblenz, Germany. During the time of the investigation, the students wrote and revised five tasks. Three of these tasks were revised after receiving teacher feedback, which focused on aspects such as appropriacy and sufficiency of information, organization, coherence and grammatical accuracy. The study investigates the effects of this kind of focused feedback on the students" revisions and explores the relationship between revision and text improvement. Large quantitative and qualitative data sets were generated during the research. The quantitative data was based on the student documents (1000 original and revised drafts) whereas the qualitative data emerged from student questionnaires and seven case studies. Chapter 8 presents descriptions of the data analyses. More specifically, it describes the initial and final coding of the revisions traced in the student documents. Then it focuses on the type of qualitative analysis employed in the case studies in order to investigate the relationship between revision and text improvement. The final section of the chapter describes the questionnaire analysis, which was carried out to investigate attitudes, benefits and constraints from the implementation of the model. Chapter 9 examines the statistical results from the analysis of the students" revisions. More specifically, it explores the revisions made by the students across tasks and the relationships between the features of the teacher feedback and these revisions. The analysis highlights patterns in the development of revision skills and positive correlations of student revisions with features of the teacher feedback. Chapter 10 looks at the descriptive data from the case studies of seven individual student writers. The analysis of this data illustrates how the specific students negotiated the revisions and sheds more light on the relationship between feedback, revision and text improvement. Chapter 11 contains the analysis of the students" answers to the questionnaire, which provide illuminative information about the feedback-related attitudes. In Chapter 12, the thesis reaches its final destination. The journey over the paths of literature exploration, data gathering and data analysis ends with reflections on the messages that emerge from the data analysis. The conclusion reached is that young students can learn how to revise their writing and focused feedback is a viable pedagogic option for teaching revision. In addition to discussing the findings, this final section considers the pedagogical implications for the teaching of writing and suggests possible avenues for further work.
Die automatische Detektion der Lage und Ausrichtung von Unterwasser-Kabeln oder -Pipelines in Kamerabildern ermöglicht es, Unterwasserfahrzeuge autonome Kontrollfahrten durchführen zu lassen. Durch Pflanzenwuchs auf und in der Nähe von Kabeln bzw. Pipelines wird deren visuelle Erfassung jedoch erschwert: Die Bestimmug der Lage über die Detektion von Kanten mit anschließender Linien-Extraktion schlägt oft fehl. Probabilistische Ansätze sind hier den deterministischen überlegen. Durch die Modellierung von Wahrscheinlichkeiten kann trotz geringer Anzahl von extrahierten Merkmalen eine Aussage über den Zustand des Systems getroffen werden. Diese Arbeit stellt ein neues auf Partikelfiltern basierendes Tracking-System für die Verfolgung von Kabeln und Pipelines in Bildsequenzen vor. Umfangreiche Experimente auf realistischen Unterwasser-Videos zeigen die Robustheit und Performanz des gewählten Ansatzes sowie Vorteile gegenüber vorangegangenen Arbeiten.
Öffentliche elektronische Beschaffung (eProcurement), bzw. strategischer elektronischer Einkauf (eSourcing), sind mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit Thema sobald eGovernment Experten aufeinander treffen. So ist es nicht überraschend, dass eProcurement im aktuellen Aktionsplan der EU als "high-impact service" eingestuft wurde. Dies lässt sich zum Großteil durch den großen Einfluss vom öffentlichen Einkauf auf die Staatskasse erklären. So macht eProcurement in der Regel bis zu 20% des BIP aus und beherbergt somit ein enormes Einsparpotenzial. Dieses Potenzial liegt zum Teil im gemeinsamen Europäischen Wirtschaftsraum, da effizientes länderübergreifendes eSourcing neue Möglichkeiten für Einkäufer sowie Lieferanten eröffnen kann. Um diese Möglichkeiten ausschöpfen zu können, müssen Prozesse und Tools in der Lage sein, miteinander zu kommunizieren, sich aufeinander abzustimmen oder transferierbar sein. In einem Wort, sie müssen interoperabel sein. In vielen wichtigen Bereichen ist Interoperabilität sehr weit fortgeschritten, in anderen hingegen muss noch viel verändert werden. Daher ist es von wesentlicher Bedeutung Interoperabilitätsanforderungen zu definieren, sowie den aktuellen Forschungs- und Entwicklungsstand zu evaluieren.