Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Masterarbeit (19)
- Ausgabe (Heft) zu einer Zeitschrift (14)
- Dissertation (11)
- Bachelorarbeit (3)
- Studienarbeit (2)
- Diplomarbeit (1)
- Habilitation (1)
Sprache
- Englisch (51) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- ontology (3)
- Linked Open Data (2)
- Maschinelles Lernen (2)
- mobile phone (2)
- multimedia metadata (2)
- 2019 European Parliament Election (1)
- API (1)
- Algolib (1)
- Analysis of social platform (1)
- Annotation (1)
Institut
- Institute for Web Science and Technologies (51) (entfernen)
Ontologien sind wichtige Werkzeuge zur Wissensrepräsentation und elementare Bausteine des Semantic Web. Sie sind jedoch nicht statisch und können sich über die Zeit verändern. Die Gründe hierfür sind vielfältig: Konzepte innerhalb einer Ontologie können fehlerhaft modelliert worden sein, die von der Ontologie repräsentierte Domäne kann sich verändern oder eine Ontologie kann wiederverwendet werden und muss an den neuen Kontext angepasst oder mit bestehenden Ontologien verbunden werden. Die Schwierigkeit dieses Prozesses hat zur Entstehung des Forschungsfeldes der Ontology Change geführt. Das Entfernen von Wissen aus Ontologien ist ein wichtiger Aspekt dieses Änderungsprozesses, da selbst das Hinzufügen neuen Wissens zu einer Ontologie das Entfernen bestehenden Wissens notwendig machen kann, falls dieses mit den neuen Vorstellungen in Konflikt steht. Dieses Entfernen muss jedoch wohldurchdacht sein, da das Ändern bestehender Konzepte leicht zu viel Wissen aus der Ontologie entfernen oder die semantische Bedeutung der Konzepte auf eine potenziell unerwartete Weise verändern kann. In dieser Arbeit wird daher ein formaler Operator zum präzisen Entfernen von Wissen aus Konzepten vorgestellt. Dieser basiert auf der Beschreibungslogik EL und baut partiell auf den Postulaten für Belief Set und Belief Base Contraction sowie der Arbeit von Suchanek et al. auf. Hierfür wird zunächst ein Einstieg in das Thema Ontologien und die Ontologiesprache OWL 2 gegeben und das Problemfeld der Ontology Change wird erläutert. Es wird dann gezeigt, wie ein formaler Operator diesen Prozess unterstützen kann und weshalb die Beschreibungslogik EL einen guten Ausgangspunkt für die Entwicklung eines solchen Operators darstellt. Anschließend wird ein Einblick in das Feld der Beschreibungslogiken gegeben. Hierfür wird die Geschichte der Beschreibungslogik kurz umrissen, Anwendungsgebiete werden genannt und es werden Standardprobleme in dieser Logik erläutert. In diesem Zusammenhang wird die Beschreibungslogik EL formal eingeführt. In einem nächsten Schritt werden verwandte Arbeiten untersucht und es wird gezeigt, warum das Recovery- und Relevance-Postulat für das Entfernen von Wissen aus Konzepten nicht unmittelbar anwendbar ist. Die hier gewonnenen Erkenntnisse werden anschließend dazu genutzt, die Anforderungen an den Operator zu formalisieren. Diese basieren hauptsächlich auf den Postulaten für Belief Set und Belief Base Contraction. Zusätzlich werden weitere Eigenschaften formuliert welche den Verlust des Recovery- bzw. Relevance-Postulates ausgleichen sollen. In einem nächsten Schritt wird der Operator definiert und es wird gezeigt, dass diese Definition das präzise Entfernen von Wissen aus EL-Konzepten gestattet. Mittels formaler Beweise wird zudem gezeigt, dass diese Definition alle zuvor aufgestellten Anforderungen erfüllt. In einem weiteren Beispiel wird dargestellt, wie der Operator in Verbindung mit sogenannten Laconic Justifications verwendet werden kann, um einen menschlichen Ontology-Editor durch das automatisierte Entfernen von unerwünschten Konsequenzen aus der Ontologie zu unterstützen. Aufbauend auf Algorithmen, welche aus der formalen Definition des Operators abgeleitet wurden, wird ein Plugin zum Entfernen von Wissen aus Ontologien für den Ontology-Editor Protégé vorgestellt. Anschließend werden die bisherigen Erkenntnisse zusammengefasst und es wird ein Fazit gezogen. Die Arbeit schließt mit einem Ausblick über mögliche zukünftige Forschung.
Navigation is a natural way to explore and discover content in a digital environment. Hence, providers of online information systems such as Wikipedia---a free online encyclopedia---are interested in providing navigational support to their users. To this end, an essential task approached in this thesis is the analysis and modeling of navigational user behavior in information networks with the goal of paving the way for the improvement and maintenance of web-based systems. Using large-scale log data from Wikipedia, this thesis first studies information access by contrasting search and navigation as the two main information access paradigms on the Web. Second, this thesis validates and builds upon existing navigational hypotheses to introduce an adaptation of the well-known PageRank algorithm. This adaptation is an improvement of the standard PageRank random surfer navigation model that results in a more "reasonable surfer" by accounting for the visual position of links, the information network regions they lead to, and the textual similarity between the link source and target articles. Finally, using agent-based simulations, this thesis compares user models that have a different knowledge of the network topology in order to investigate the amount and type of network topological information needed for efficient navigation. An evaluation of agents' success on four different networks reveals that in order to navigate efficiently, users require only a small amount of high-quality knowledge of the network topology. Aside from the direct benefits to content ranking provided by the "reasonable surfer" version of PageRank, the empirical insights presented in this thesis may also have an impact on system design decisions and Wikipedia editor guidelines, i.e., for link placement and webpage layout.
We examine the systematic underrecognition of female scientists (Matilda effect) by exploring the citation network of papers published in the American Physical Society (APS) journals. Our analysis shows that articles written by men (first author, last author and dominant gender of authors) receive more citations than similar articles written by women (first author, last author and dominant gender of authors) after controlling for the journal of publication, year of publication and content of the publication. Statistical significance of the overlap between the lists of references was considered as the measure of similarity between articles in our analysis. In addition, we found that men are less likely to cite articles written by women and women are less likely to cite articles written by men. This pattern leads to receiving more citations by articles written by men than similar articles written by women because the majority of authors who published in APS journals are male (85%). We also observed Matilda effect reduces when articles are published in journals with the highest impact factors. In other words, people’s evaluation of articles published in these journals is not affected by the gender of authors significantly. Finally, we suggested a method that can be applied by editors in academic journals to reduce the evaluation bias to some extent. Editors can identify missing citations using our proposed method to complete bibliographies. This policy can reduce the evaluation bias because we observed papers written by female scholars (first author, last author, the dominant gender of authors) miss more citations than articles written by male scholars (first author, last author, the dominant gender of authors).
Knowledge-based authentication methods are vulnerable to Shoulder surfing phenomenon.
The widespread usage of these methods and not addressing the limitations it has could result in the user’s information to be compromised. User authentication method ought to be effortless to use and efficient, nevertheless secure.
The problem that we face concerning the security of PIN (Personal Identification Number) or password entry is shoulder surfing, in which a direct or indirect malicious observer could identify the user sensitive information. To tackle this issue we present TouchGaze which combines gaze signals and touch capabilities, as an input method for entering user’s credentials. Gaze signals will be primarily used to enhance targeting and touch for selecting. In this work, we have designed three different PIN entry method which they all have similar interfaces. For the evaluation, these methods were compared based on efficiency, accuracy, and usability. The results uncovered that despite the fact that gaze-based methods require extra time for the user to get familiar with yet it is considered more secure. In regards to efficiency, it has the similar error margin to the traditional PIN entry methods.
Topic Models sind ein beliebtes Werkzeug um Themen in großen Textkorpora zu identifizieren. Diese Textkorpora enthalten oft versteckte Meta-Gruppen. Das Größenverhältnis zwischen diesen Gruppen variiert meist stark. Die Präsenz dieser Gruppen wird in der Praxis oft ignoriert. Diese Masterarbeit erforscht daher, ob diese Gruppen Einfluss auf ein Topic Model haben.
Um den Einfluss zu testen, wird LDA auf Samples mit unterschiedlichen Gruppengrößen trainiert. Die Samples werden von Textkorpora mit großen Gruppenunterschieden (d.h. Sprachunterschieden) und kleinen Gruppenunterschieden (d.h. Unterschiede in der politische Orientierung) generiert. Die Leistungsfähigkeit von LDA wird per "Perplexity" evaluiert.
Der Einfluss von Gruppen auf die generelle Leistungsfähigkeit von Topic Models hängt von verschiedenen Faktoren der Gruppen ab, z.B. der Vorhersagbarkeit der Sprache generell. Die Leistungsfähigkeit der Topic Models für die einzelnen Gruppen wird von der Variation der relativen Gruppengrößen beeinflusst. Allerdings ist der Effekt für alle Datensätze verschieden.
LDA kann die Gruppen intern unterscheiden, wenn die Unterschiede der Gruppen groß genug sind (z.B. Sprachunterschiede). Der Anteil der Topics, die explizit für eine Gruppe gelernt werden, ist jedoch unterproportional zu dem Anteil der Gruppe im Trainingskorpus. Dieser Effekt verstärkt sich für kleinere Minderheiten.
The purpose of this thesis is to explore the sentiment distributions of Wikipedia concepts.
We analyse the sentiment of the entire English Wikipedia corpus, which includes 5,669,867 articles and 1,906,375 talks, by using a lexicon-based method with four different lexicons.
Also, we explore the sentiment distributions from a time perspective using the sentiment scores obtained from our selected corpus. The results obtained have been compared not only between articles and talks but also among four lexicons: OL, MPQA, LIWC, and ANEW.
Our findings show that among the four lexicons, MPQA has the highest sensitivity and ANEW has the lowest sensitivity to emotional expressions. Wikipedia articles show more sentiments than talks according to OL, MPQA, and LIWC, whereas Wikipedia talks show more sentiments than articles according to ANEW. Besides, the sentiment has a trend regarding time series, and each lexicon has its own bias regarding text describing different things.
Moreover, our research provides three interactive widgets for visualising sentiment distributions for Wikipedia concepts regarding the time and geolocation attributes of concepts.
Belief revision is the subarea of knowledge representation which studies the dynamics of epistemic states of an agent. In the classical AGM approach, contraction, as part of the belief revision, deals with the removal of beliefs in knowledge bases. This master's thesis presents the study and the implementation of concept contraction in the Description Logic EL. Concept contraction deals with the following situation. Given two concept C and D, assuming that C is subsumed by D, how can concept C be changed so that it is not subsumed by D anymore, but is as similar as possible to C? This approach of belief change is different from other related work because it deals with contraction in the level of concepts and not T-Boxes and A-Boxes in general. The main contribution of the thesis is the implementation of the concept contraction. The implementation provides insight into the complexity of contraction in EL, which is tractable since the main inference task in EL is also tractable. The implementation consists of the design of five algorithms that are necessary for concept contraction. The algorithms are described, illustrated with examples, and analyzed in terms of time complexity. Furthermore, we propose an new approach for a selection function, adapt for the concept contraction. The selection function uses metadata about the concepts in order to select the best from an input set. The metadata is modeled in a framework that we have designed, based on standard metadata frameworks. As an important part of the concept contraction, the selection function is responsible for selecting the best concepts that are as similar as possible to concept C. Lastly, we have successfully implemented the concept contraction in Python, and the results are promising.
Commonsense reasoning can be seen as a process of identifying dependencies amongst events and actions. Understanding the circumstances surrounding these events requires background knowledge with sufficient breadth to cover a wide variety of domains. In the recent decades, there has been a lot of work in extracting commonsense knowledge, a number of these projects provide their collected data as semantic networks such as ConceptNet and CausalNet. In this thesis, we attempt to undertake the Choice Of Plausible Alternatives (COPA) challenge, a problem set with 1000 questions written in multiple-choice format with a premise and two alternative choices for each question. Our approach differs from previous work by using shortest paths between concepts in a causal graph with the edge weight as causality metric. We use CausalNet as primary network and implement a few design choices to explore the strengths and drawbacks of this approach, and propose an extension using ConceptNet by leveraging its commonsense knowledge base.
Current political issues are often reflected in social media discussions, gathering politicians and voters on common platforms. As these can affect the public perception of politics, the inner dynamics and backgrounds of such debates are of great scientific interest. This thesis takes user generated messages from an up-to-date dataset of considerable relevance as Time Series, and applies a topic-based analysis of inspiration and agenda setting to it. The Institute for Web Science and Technologies of the University Koblenz-Landau has collected Twitter data generated beforehand by candidates of the European Parliament Election 2019. This work processes and analyzes the dataset for various properties, while focusing on the influence of politicians and media on online debates. An algorithm to cluster tweets into topical threads is introduced. Subsequently, Sequential Association Rules are mined, yielding wide array of potential influence relations between both actors and topics. The elaborated methodology can be configured with different parameters and is extensible in functionality and scope of application.