Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
- 2008 (22) (entfernen)
Dokumenttyp
- Ausgabe (Heft) zu einer Zeitschrift (12)
- Studienarbeit (7)
- Masterarbeit (2)
- Diplomarbeit (1)
Schlagworte
- 3D-Modell (1)
- ATMega 16 (1)
- ATmega644 (1)
- ATtiny2313 (1)
- Alex Bernstein (1)
- Ambient Occlusion (1)
- Bachelorstudiengang (1)
- Bluetooth (1)
- Burg (1)
- CSMs (1)
Institut
- Fachbereich 4 (22) (entfernen)
Semantic desktop environments aim at improving the effectiveness and efficiency of users carrying out daily tasks within their personal information management infrastructure (PIM). They support the user by transferring and exploiting the explicit semantics of data items across different PIM applications. Whether such an approach does indeed reach its aim of facilitating users" life and—if so—to which extent, however, remains an open question that we address in this paper with the first summative evaluation of a semantic desktop approach. We approach the research question exploiting our own semantic desktop infrastructure, X-COSIM. As data corpus, we have used over 100 emails and 50 documents extracted from the organizers of a conference-like event at our university. The evaluation has been carried out with 18 subjects. We have developed a test environment to evaluate COSIMail and COSIFile, two semantic PIM applications based on X-COSIM. As result, we have found a significant improvement for typical PIM tasks compared to a standard desktop environment.
Colonoscopy is one of the best methods for screening colon cancer. As the automatic detection of polyps in endoscopic images is a challenging task for image processing, a variety of research groups have proposed methods that try to fulfill this task to develop a system which supports the doctors during examination. However, the problem is still "at least partially" not solved. This paper gives a summary of 16 different polyp detection methods published in the last ten years. We found out that the major draw-back of many approaches is the lack of representative video data, which hinders comparison and evaluation of the published methods.