Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Masterarbeit (18) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
Institut
- Institute for Web Science and Technologies (18) (entfernen)
The purpose of this thesis is to explore the sentiment distributions of Wikipedia concepts.
We analyse the sentiment of the entire English Wikipedia corpus, which includes 5,669,867 articles and 1,906,375 talks, by using a lexicon-based method with four different lexicons.
Also, we explore the sentiment distributions from a time perspective using the sentiment scores obtained from our selected corpus. The results obtained have been compared not only between articles and talks but also among four lexicons: OL, MPQA, LIWC, and ANEW.
Our findings show that among the four lexicons, MPQA has the highest sensitivity and ANEW has the lowest sensitivity to emotional expressions. Wikipedia articles show more sentiments than talks according to OL, MPQA, and LIWC, whereas Wikipedia talks show more sentiments than articles according to ANEW. Besides, the sentiment has a trend regarding time series, and each lexicon has its own bias regarding text describing different things.
Moreover, our research provides three interactive widgets for visualising sentiment distributions for Wikipedia concepts regarding the time and geolocation attributes of concepts.
This Master Thesis is an exploratory research to determine whether it is feasible to construct a subjectivity lexicon using Wikipedia. The key hypothesis is that that all quotes in Wikipedia are subjective and all regular text are objective. The degree of subjectivity of a word, also known as ''Quote Score'' is determined based on the ratio of word frequency in quotations to its frequency outside quotations. The proportion of words in the English Wikipedia which are within quotations is found to be much smaller as compared to those which are not in quotes, resulting in a right-skewed distribution and low mean value of Quote Scores.
The methodology used to generate the subjectivity lexicon from text corpus in English Wikipedia is designed in such a way that it can be scaled and reused to produce similar subjectivity lexica of other languages. This is achieved by abstaining from domain and language-specific methods, apart from using only readily-available English dictionary packages to detect and exclude stopwords and non-English words in the Wikipedia text corpus.
The subjectivity lexicon generated from English Wikipedia is compared against other lexica; namely MPQA and SentiWordNet. It is found that words which are strongly subjective tend to have high Quote Scores in the subjectivity lexicon generated from English Wikipedia. There is a large observable difference between distribution of Quote Scores for words classified as strongly subjective versus distribution of Quote Scores for words classified as weakly subjective and objective. However, weakly subjective and objective words cannot be differentiated clearly based on Quote Score. In addition to that, a questionnaire is commissioned as an exploratory approach to investigate whether subjectivity lexicon generated from Wikipedia could be used to extend the coverage of words of existing lexica.
The content aggregator platform Reddit has established itself as one of the most popular websites in the world. However, scientific research on Reddit is hindered as Reddit allows (and even encourages) user anonymity, i.e., user profiles do not contain personal information such as the gender. Inferring the gender of users in large-scale could enable the analysis of gender-specific areas of interest, reactions to events, and behavioral patterns. In this direction, this thesis suggests a machine learning approach of estimating the gender of Reddit users. By exploiting specific conventions in parts of the website, we obtain a ground truth for more than 190 million comments of labeled users. This data is then used to train machine learning classifiers to use them to gain insights about the gender balance of particular subreddits and the platform in general. By comparing a variety of different approaches for classification algorithm, we find that character-level convolutional neural network achieves performance with an 82.3% F1 score on a task of predicting a gender of a user based on his/her comments. The score surpasses 85% mark for frequent users with more than 50 comments. Furthermore, we discover that female users are less active on Reddit platform, they write fewer comments and post in fewer subreddits on average, when compared to male users.
Current political issues are often reflected in social media discussions, gathering politicians and voters on common platforms. As these can affect the public perception of politics, the inner dynamics and backgrounds of such debates are of great scientific interest. This thesis takes user generated messages from an up-to-date dataset of considerable relevance as Time Series, and applies a topic-based analysis of inspiration and agenda setting to it. The Institute for Web Science and Technologies of the University Koblenz-Landau has collected Twitter data generated beforehand by candidates of the European Parliament Election 2019. This work processes and analyzes the dataset for various properties, while focusing on the influence of politicians and media on online debates. An algorithm to cluster tweets into topical threads is introduced. Subsequently, Sequential Association Rules are mined, yielding wide array of potential influence relations between both actors and topics. The elaborated methodology can be configured with different parameters and is extensible in functionality and scope of application.
The output of eye tracking Web usability studies can be visualized to the analysts as screenshots of the Web pages with their gaze data. However, the screenshot visualizations are found to be corrupted whenever there are recorded fixations on fixed Web page elements on different scroll positions. The gaze data are not gathered on their fixated fixed elements; rather they are scattered on their recorded scroll positions. This problem has raised our attention to find an approach to link gaze data to their intended fixed elements and gather them in one position on the screenshot. The approach builds upon the concept of creating the screenshot during the recording session, where images of the viewport are captured on visited scroll positions and lastly stitched into one Web page screenshot. Additionally, the fixed elements in the Web page are identified and linked to their fixations. For the evaluation, we compared the interpretation of our enhanced screenshot against the video visualization, which overcomes the problem. The results revealed that both visualizations equally deliver accurate interpretations. However, interpreting the visualizations of eye tracking Web usability studies using the enhanced screenshots outperforms the video visualizations in terms of speed and it requires less temporal demands from the interpreters.
This thesis focuses on approximate inference in assumption-based argumentation frameworks. Argumentation provides a significant idea in the computerization of theoretical and practical reasoning in AI. And it has a close connection with AI, engaging in arguments to perform scientific reasoning. The fundamental approach in this field is abstract argumentation frameworks developed by Dung. Assumption-based argumentation can be regarded as an instance of abstract argumentation with structured arguments. When facing a large scale of data, a challenge of reasoning in assumption-based argumentation is how to construct arguments and resolve attacks over a given claim with minimal cost of computation and acceptable accuracy at the same time. This thesis proposes and investigates approximate methods that randomly select and construct samples of frameworks based on graphical dispute derivations to solve this problem. The presented approach aims to improve reasoning performance and get an acceptable trade-off between computational time and accuracy. The evaluation shows that for reasoning in assumption-based argumentation, in general, the running time is reduced with the cost of slightly low accuracy by randomly sampling and constructing inference rules for potential arguments over a query.
“Did I say something wrong?” A word-level analysis of Wikipedia articles for deletion discussions
(2016)
Diese Arbeit beschäftigt sich damit, linguistische Erkenntnisse auf Wortebene über schriftlichen Diskussionen zu gewinnen. Die Unterscheidung zwischen Botschaften, welche sich förderlich auf Diskussionen auswirken und jene, welche diese unterbrechen, spielte dabei eine besondere Rolle. Hierbei lag ein Schwerpunkt darauf, zu ermitteln, ob Ich- und Du-Botschaften charakteristisch für die beiden Kommunikationsarten sind. Diese Botschaften sind über Jahre hinweg zu Empfehlungen für erfolgreiche Kommunikation avanciert. Ihre zugeschriebene Wirkung wurde zwar mehrfach bestätigt, jedoch geschah dies stets in kleineren Studien. Deshalb wurde in dieser Arbeit mithilfe der Löschdiskussionen der englischen Wikipedia und der Liste gesperrter Nutzer eine vollautomatische Erstellung eines annotierten Datensatzes entwickelt. Dabei wurden Diskussionsbotschaften entweder als förderlich oder schädlich für einen konstruktiven Diskussionsverlauf markiert. Dieser Datensatz wurde anschließend im Rahmen einer binären Klassifikation verwendet, um charakteristische Worte für die beiden Kommunikationsarten zu bestimmen. Es wurde zudem untersucht, ob anhand von Synsemantika (auch bekannt als Funktionswörter) wie Pronomen oder Konjunktionen eine Entscheidung über die Kommunikationsart einer Botschaft getroffen werden kann. Du-Botschaften wurden, übereinstimmend mit ihrer zugeschriebenen negativen Auswirkung auf Kommunikation, als schädlich in den durchgeführten Untersuchungen identifiziert. Entgegen der zugeschriebenen positiven Auswirkung von Ich-Botschaften, wurde bei diesen ebenfalls eine schädlich Wirkung festgestellt. Eine klare Aussage über die Relevanz von Synsemantika konnte anhand der Ergebnisse nicht getroffen werden. Weitere charakteristische Worte konnten nicht festgestellt werden. Die Ergebnisse deuten darauf hin, dass ein anderes Modell textliche Diskussionen potentiell besser abbilden könnte.
Topic Models sind ein beliebtes Werkzeug um Themen in großen Textkorpora zu identifizieren. Diese Textkorpora enthalten oft versteckte Meta-Gruppen. Das Größenverhältnis zwischen diesen Gruppen variiert meist stark. Die Präsenz dieser Gruppen wird in der Praxis oft ignoriert. Diese Masterarbeit erforscht daher, ob diese Gruppen Einfluss auf ein Topic Model haben.
Um den Einfluss zu testen, wird LDA auf Samples mit unterschiedlichen Gruppengrößen trainiert. Die Samples werden von Textkorpora mit großen Gruppenunterschieden (d.h. Sprachunterschieden) und kleinen Gruppenunterschieden (d.h. Unterschiede in der politische Orientierung) generiert. Die Leistungsfähigkeit von LDA wird per "Perplexity" evaluiert.
Der Einfluss von Gruppen auf die generelle Leistungsfähigkeit von Topic Models hängt von verschiedenen Faktoren der Gruppen ab, z.B. der Vorhersagbarkeit der Sprache generell. Die Leistungsfähigkeit der Topic Models für die einzelnen Gruppen wird von der Variation der relativen Gruppengrößen beeinflusst. Allerdings ist der Effekt für alle Datensätze verschieden.
LDA kann die Gruppen intern unterscheiden, wenn die Unterschiede der Gruppen groß genug sind (z.B. Sprachunterschiede). Der Anteil der Topics, die explizit für eine Gruppe gelernt werden, ist jedoch unterproportional zu dem Anteil der Gruppe im Trainingskorpus. Dieser Effekt verstärkt sich für kleinere Minderheiten.
Our work finds the fine grained edits in context of neighbouring tokens in Wikipedia articles. We cluster those edits according to similar neighbouring context. We encode neighbouring context into vector space using word vectors. We evaluate clusters returned by our algorithm on extrinsic and intrinsic metric and compare it with previous work. We analyse the relation between extrinsic and intrinsic measurements of fine grained edit tokens.
Commonsense reasoning can be seen as a process of identifying dependencies amongst events and actions. Understanding the circumstances surrounding these events requires background knowledge with sufficient breadth to cover a wide variety of domains. In the recent decades, there has been a lot of work in extracting commonsense knowledge, a number of these projects provide their collected data as semantic networks such as ConceptNet and CausalNet. In this thesis, we attempt to undertake the Choice Of Plausible Alternatives (COPA) challenge, a problem set with 1000 questions written in multiple-choice format with a premise and two alternative choices for each question. Our approach differs from previous work by using shortest paths between concepts in a causal graph with the edge weight as causality metric. We use CausalNet as primary network and implement a few design choices to explore the strengths and drawbacks of this approach, and propose an extension using ConceptNet by leveraging its commonsense knowledge base.